History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sokolow v. Sokolow
14 A.D.2d 797
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1961
|
Check Treatment

Since this was a nonjury case, the trial court was required to render a decision, either oral or written, stating the facts which it deemed essential (Civ. Prae. Act, § 440). This it did not do. The decision required by section 440 of the Civil Practice Act may not be omitted (Driskell v. Alfano, 12 A D 2d 973). Beldock, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Sokolow v. Sokolow
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 16, 1961
Citation: 14 A.D.2d 797
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.