History
  • No items yet
midpage
Claim of Nissen v. Cory
210 N.Y.S.2d 9
N.Y. App. Div.
1961
Check Treatment

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Claimant became ill while performing heavy work in his employment, and his condition has been diagnosed as a coronary occlusion and posterior myocardial infarction. There is *869medical proof associating the condition with the work and attributing it to accident; but there is other medical proof, the basis of which is fully stated in the record, that there was no relationship between the work and the condition. We feel unable to interfere on this record with the resolution by the board of this issue, adversely to claimant. (Matter of McSweeney v. Hammerlimd Mfg. Co., 275 App. Div. 447.) Decision unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In decisions Nos. 23-26: Concur — Bergan, P. J., Coon, Gibson, Herlihy and Reynolds, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Claim of Nissen v. Cory
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 25, 1961
Citation: 210 N.Y.S.2d 9
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.