Judgment, Supreme
Defendant’s argument that, in making its probable cause determination, the hearing court improperly relied on the minutes of an ex parte, in camera proceeding conducted pursuant to People v Darden (34 NY2d 177 [1974]) is unpreserved (see People v Tutt, 38 NY2d 1011 [1976]; see also People v Kello, 96 NY2d 740, 743-744 [2001]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Friedman, J.E, Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
