Order, dated April 1, 1960, denying petitioner’s motion for an order of mandamus, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act and dismissing the petition, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. No opinion. Motion for leave to file copies of article in Howard Law Journal and for other relief denied. The court has, however, considered the article in arriving at its decision. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.