History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spatz v. Silverston
204 N.Y.S.2d 639
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1960
|
Check Treatment

— In an action for an accounting of rents and profits of a parcel of real property, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 18,1959, which denied their motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Despite the fact that better verbiage could have been employed for the purpose in the probated will in question, it is sufficiently clear that the testatrix by her will gave defendant Harry Silverston a life estate in the property, and gave the fee interest in the property to the plaintiff and to the defendant Nathan Silverston, subject to the said life estate. Under the circumstances, plaintiff has failed to show any right of action against defendants, and there is no triable issue of fact. Nolan, P. J., Beldóek, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Spatz v. Silverston
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 27, 1960
Citation: 204 N.Y.S.2d 639
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.