Orders unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to plaintiff-respondent. In affirming, this court does not pass, as it need not, on the nature of the protectible interest that plaintiff had at the time that the joint venture was terminated by his exclusion. Similarly, the court does not consider what would be the appropriate relief or measure of damage. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.