History
  • No items yet
midpage
Watt v. Spencer
36 A.D.3d 440
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2007
|
Check Treatment

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered March 1, 2006, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to vacate his default in answering the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of the strong policy of the courts in favor of deciding cases on their merits (see Dokmecian v ABN AMRO N. Am., 304 AD2d 445 [2003]), the motion court did not improvidently *441exercise its discretion in accepting defendant’s affidavit showing a potentially meritorious defense and counsel’s reasonable excuse for the default (see Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md. v Andersen & Co., 60 NY2d 693 [1983]). Concur — Sullivan, J.E, Williams, Sweeny, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Watt v. Spencer
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 9, 2007
Citation: 36 A.D.3d 440
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.