History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kamerman v. Pickard
200 N.Y.S.2d 348
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1960
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. Plaintiff may renew the motion for discovery and inspection after the conclusion of the examination before trial upon a showing of the inadequacy of the examination. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Prank, Yalente and McNally, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Kamerman v. Pickard
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 12, 1960
Citation: 200 N.Y.S.2d 348
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.