History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eisenberg v. Wallen
201 N.Y.S.2d 491
N.Y. App. Div.
1960
Check Treatment

In an action by a licensed real estate broker to recover commissions for the sale of real property, the appeal is from a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, in favor of the respondent and against the appellants. The appellants contend that no meeting of the minds between the buyer and the sellers (appellants and defendant Silberstein) was established, that essential terms of sale were not proved, and that respondent had faded to prove either a contract of employment 'by the sellers or authority granted by them for his hiring. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Beldoek, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld,. Christ and Pette, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Eisenberg v. Wallen
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 1960
Citation: 201 N.Y.S.2d 491
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.