History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherman v. Flower
197 N.Y.S.2d 855
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1960
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for injuries to person and property, and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order made on reargument which (1) granted a motion for summary judgment striking out the answer, and (2) directed an assessment of damages. Order modified by striking therefrom everything following the words “ upon reargument ” in the second ordering paragraph and by substituting therefor the words “ the original decision is adhered to ”. As so modified, order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. In our opinion, there are questions of fact that preclude summary judgment. Present —Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Pette, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Sherman v. Flower
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 29, 1960
Citation: 197 N.Y.S.2d 855
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.