Appeal by the employer ahd its carrier from a decision and award of the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The claimant, who was employed as a night Watchman, was assaulted by two men, beaten and robbed. "The claimant told different Versions Of what had Occurred, stating first that he had left the job site tó get coffee and had returned when the assault occurred and then that he had gone into a tavern for coffee, had a bottle of coca cola Because they did hot serve Coffee and when he came out and started back he was assaulted. Originally the board made ah award and this ctihrt reversed because the carrier had hot been permitted an adjournment so that it might attempt to show that á restaurant nearer the construction site had been open (1 A D 2d 863) and that therefore claimant had deviated from his employment. At the subsequent hearings; among other things; it was shown that the restaurant to which the carrier was referring was right across the street from the tavern into which the claimant had gone. This restaurant customarily clósed at 12:30 a.ji. The finflings qf the board show that the aSsaqlt tpok
