History
  • No items yet
midpage
A. J. Armstrong Co. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.
193 N.Y.S.2d 242
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order and judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to the appellants, and the motion denied, with $10 costs. The action is to recover on an account receivable allegedly assigned to the plaintiff. The invoice representing the indebtedness contains a notation in the body thereof typed in the same manner as all of the rest of the matter contained therein, which reads “please make payment of this invoice to:” followed by the name and address of the plaintiff and concluding with the. words “thank you ” We irrast hold ftat there are issues, of fact requiring a trial. Included jfl *872such issues is the question whether the notation referred to was sufficient to put the defendants on notice that the account was assigned. This, without reference to any others, raises triable issues. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: A. J. Armstrong Co. v. Kasco Mills, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 1, 1959
Citation: 193 N.Y.S.2d 242
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.