History
  • No items yet
midpage
Coulton v. Brittingham
9 A.D.2d 653
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements, and the motion to dismiss the action as against defendant F. & A. Transportation of N. J., Inc., is granted, with $10 costs. The inordinate and inexcusable delay in the prosecution of the action, as well as the absence of any showing of merit, warrant the unconditional dismissal of the action as against the appealing defendant (Gallagher v. Clafi.ngton, Ino., 7 A D 2d 627, and cases cited therein). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, McNally, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Coulton v. Brittingham
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 13, 1959
Citation: 9 A.D.2d 653
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.