History
  • No items yet
midpage
Histon v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.
188 N.Y.S.2d 270
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order denying conditionally, plaintiffs’ motion to vacate the notices of examination before trial unanimously reversed, on the law and in the court’s discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant-respondent and motion denied without qualification. This is not a class action. Each plaintiff sues on his or her own behalf, but for convenience, all have joined *802together in one action. Defendant is entitled, if it deems it necessary, to examine each plaintiff with respect to matters that are relevant and material. The factual situation, particularly with respect to the affirmative defenses, may not be the same with respect to all plaintiffs. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Prank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Histon v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 23, 1959
Citation: 188 N.Y.S.2d 270
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.