History
  • No items yet
midpage
Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank
187 N.Y.S.2d 411
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. It is not necessary to plead the matter contained in the separate defense and counterclaim in order to ensure- its materiality under the pleadings. If defendant offers evidence relating to the allegations of the aforementioned defense and counterclaim, it will be for the trial court to pass upon its admissibility. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Valente, Stevens and Bastow, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Oresky v. Manhattan Savings Bank
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 16, 1959
Citation: 187 N.Y.S.2d 411
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.