History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. Kostynick
1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 caste and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. Kostynick
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 6, 1959
Citation: 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.