History
  • No items yet
midpage
Reed v. Kostynick
1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331
N.Y. App. Div.
1959
Check Treatment

In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prae., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 caste and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallman and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Reed v. Kostynick
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 6, 1959
Citation: 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9331
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.