History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis
184 N.Y.S.2d 928
N.Y. App. Div.
1959
Check Treatment

Order unanimously modified, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, by eliminating the last ordered paragraph in the order appealed from, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. The award is responsive to the respective demands for arbitration. Any dispute incident to compliance with the award may be properly the subject of further arbitration, but that question is not yet reached. Under the circumstances, the appointment of a referee to take and state the account is unnecessary. (Matter of Hunter [Proser], 274 App. Div. 311, affd. 298 N. Y. 828.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re the Arbitration between Koppell & Davis
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 28, 1959
Citation: 184 N.Y.S.2d 928
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.