History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re 165 Broadway Building, Inc.
182 N.Y.S.2d 89
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1959
|
Check Treatment

Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the petitioner-respondent on the facts and on the law and in the exercise of discretion. It would have been proper for the Referee to receive expert testimony, if offered, as to (1) the highest price obtainable at a foreclosure sale, and (2) the maximum price obtainable for the premises in its present condition, on an all cash sale, in the open market, during the period required to process a foreclosure. Such proof was not essentially required from the appraiser appointed by the court but, if available, could have been tendered by the trustee or any other interested party. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: In re 165 Broadway Building, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 3, 1959
Citation: 182 N.Y.S.2d 89
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.