History
  • No items yet
midpage
Suthergreen v. Westall
6 A.D.2d 1014
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1958
|
Check Treatment

Order granting motion to dismiss proceeding unanimously affirmed, without costs. Assuming, arguendo, that the failure to join respondent Esser, the successful candidate, as a party was not fatal to the proceeding (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 192, 193), the defect could not be cured after the time limited for the institution of the proceeding, namely, 10 days after the primary election in question (Election Law, § 330, subd. 2; cf. Matter of Kram v. Cohen, 293 N. Y. 746; Matter of Swan v. Cohen, 179 Misc. 69, affd. 262 App. Div. 956, affd. 286 N. Y. 678; Matter of Gallagher v. Cohen, 180 Misc. 1030; Devine v. Cohen, 73 N. Y. S. 2d 317; Matter of Brennan, 73 N. Y. S. 2d 317; Matter of Kaplan, v. Meisser, 196 Misc. 6; Yearwood v. Cohen, 37 N. Y. S. 2d 577). Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldock, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Suthergreen v. Westall
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Sep 22, 1958
Citation: 6 A.D.2d 1014
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.