History
  • No items yet
midpage
De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
174 N.Y.S.2d 891
N.Y. App. Div.
1958
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for fraud and conspiracy, and for an accounting, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss each of the three causes of action pleaded in the amended complaint as insufficient in law (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [9 Misc 2d 983.]

Case Details

Case Name: De Daniel Espuny v. Victor M. Calderon Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 12, 1958
Citation: 174 N.Y.S.2d 891
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.