History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rosenberg v. Steinberg-Kass, Inc.
6 A.D.2d 685
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1958
|
Check Treatment

Mandamus does not lie in behalf of a former stockholder and officer of a corporation for the inspection of its books. The common-law and statutory right of inspection depends on the subsisting status of stockholder or officer in respect to the corporation. The petition fails to allege that petitioner presently is a stockholder or officer of the corporate respondent; hence, it is legally insufficient. We do not pass on the respondents’ contractual rights under the agreements of the parties dated October 21, 1954 and March 29, 1957. The order unanimously reversed on the law and the petition dismissed, without costs, and without prejudice to any appropriate action petitioner is advised to bring. Concur—Botein, P. J., Breitel, Prank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Rosenberg v. Steinberg-Kass, Inc.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 27, 1958
Citation: 6 A.D.2d 685
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.