History
  • No items yet
midpage
Abar v. Cooper
175 N.Y.S.2d 279
N.Y. App. Div.
1958
Check Treatment

Order of Special Term dismissing the complaint is unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of granting plaintiff leave to replead, and is otherwise affirmed with costs to plaintiff to abide the event. It is conceded that the plaintiff has capacity to sue. He should allege, however, either exhaustion of administrative remedies or the futility of such action. Moreover, it would appear that all parties upon whom a judgment would be binding should be joined, and this suggests the pro*683priety of adding as parties the Union and members of the class benefited by the pension fund, at least in some representative capacity. Settle order. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Abar v. Cooper
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: May 27, 1958
Citation: 175 N.Y.S.2d 279
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.