History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Barron
23 A.D.3d 1125
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from an amended judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frank A. Sedita, Jr., J.), entered March 10, 2004 in a personal injury action. The amended judgment awarded plaintiff $184,350.23 upon a jury verdict.

It is hereby ordered that the amended judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: The contention of defendants that Supreme Court erred in denying their motion to strike plaintiff’s supplemental bill of particulars alleging new injuries after the note of issue had been filed is not reviewable on this appeal because the motion papers are not included in the record before us. Defendants, as the appellants, “submitted this appeal on an incomplete record and must suffer the consequences” (Matter of Santoshia L., 202 AD2d 1027, 1028 [1994]; see LeRoi & Assoc. v *1126Bryant, 309 AD2d 1144 [2003]). We have examined defendants’ remaining contentions and conclude that none requires reversal. Present—Kehoe, J.P., Martoche, Pine, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Barron
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 10, 2005
Citation: 23 A.D.3d 1125
Docket Number: Appeal No. 3
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.