History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Jarvis
22 A.D.3d 865
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered October 23, 2003, convicting him of criminally negligent homicide, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of criminally negligent homicide is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of criminally negligent homicide beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. Cozier, J.P., Ritter, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Jarvis
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 31, 2005
Citation: 22 A.D.3d 865
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.