History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
19 A.D.3d 864
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1987, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 15, 2000 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (273 AD2d 600 [2000]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent’s application.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Cardona, PJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jun 16, 2005
Citation: 19 A.D.3d 864
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.