History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Arteaga
16 A.D.3d 696
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rosengarten, J.), rendered May 2, 2003, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

*697Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Prudenti, P.J., Schmidt, Santucci, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Arteaga
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 2005
Citation: 16 A.D.3d 696
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.