History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walderbray v. Pirro
16 A.D.3d 694
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prohibit the respondents from proceeding with the criminal *695action entitled People v Walderbray, pending in the County Court, Westchester County, under indictment No. 308-04, and application for poor person relief.

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Schmidt, J.P., Goldstein, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Walderbray v. Pirro
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 28, 2005
Citation: 16 A.D.3d 694
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.