History
  • No items yet
midpage
In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
788 N.Y.S.2d 627
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2005
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1990, was suspended by this Court’s order dated June 7, 1999 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (262 AD2d 702 [1999]).

Respondent has now complied with the registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and has paid the fees as required by the statute and rules of the Chief Administrative Judge. Petitioner does not object to respondent’s instant application for reinstatement.

Respondent’s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

*723Cardona, EJ., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted, and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case Details

Case Name: In re Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 3, 2005
Citation: 788 N.Y.S.2d 627
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.