History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Candelaria
786 N.Y.S.2d 780
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from a *1192judgment of the Ontario County Court (Frederick G. Reed, J.), rendered June 20, 2003. The judgment revoked defendant’s probation and imposed a sentence of incarceration.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment that revoked his probation and imposed an indeterminate term of incarceration of IV2 to 4V2 years. County Court did not err in revoking defendant’s probation because the People proved by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated two conditions of his probation (see People v Pettway, 286 AD2d 865 [2001]). We further conclude that defendant’s sentence is not unduly harsh or severe.

Defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Hurlbutt, Gorski, Martoche and Smith, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Candelaria
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Dec 30, 2004
Citation: 786 N.Y.S.2d 780
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.