History
  • No items yet
midpage
O'Connor v. New York City Transit Authority
149 N.Y.S.2d 223
| N.Y. App. Div. | 1956
|
Check Treatment

It appears that since the entry of the order appealed from the petitioner has been retired as an employee of the New York City Transit Authority by virtue of the adoption of a resolution by the board of estimate of the City of New York, effective as of June 1, 1955. Order unanimously modified so as to provide that the New York City Transit Authority be directed to pay to the petitioner, Maurice O’Connor, his full pay as a conductor in defendant’s employment from August 26, 1954, to May 31, 1955, less any sick leave with pay and vacation with pay granted by the defendant to the petitioner during such period, and less any other compensation earned by the petitioner from any other occupation during such period and, as so modified, the order is affirmed. Settle order on notice. Concur — Peek, P. J., Bastow, Rabin and Frank, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: O'Connor v. New York City Transit Authority
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 7, 1956
Citation: 149 N.Y.S.2d 223
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.