History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Dao
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9660
N.Y. App. Div.
2004
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Nassau County (Brown, J.), dated July 18, 2001, which, pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C, designated him a level three sex offender.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court’s designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act was *402supported by clear and convincing evidence (see Correction Law art 6-C; People v Smith, 5 AD3d 752 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 602 [2004]; People v Moore, 1 AD3d 421 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 743 [2004]; People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99 [2003]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Dao
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 12, 2004
Citation: 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9660
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.