History
  • No items yet
midpage
Converso v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3126
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered April 12, 2003. The order removed the action to Buffalo City Court.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Erie County, for further proceedings on the complaint.

Memorandum: We agree with defendant that Supreme Court abused its discretion in sua sponte removing this action to City Court pursuant to CPLR 325 (d) and 22 NYCRR 202.13 (e) (see Gair Co. v Cambridge Carpet, 160 AD2d 371 [1990]). We therefore reverse the order and remit the matter to Supreme Court for further proceedings on the complaint. Present—Wisner, J.P., Hurlbutt, Kehoe, Lawton and Hayes, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Converso v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 19, 2004
Citation: 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3126
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.