The finding that petitioner subjected an individual to sexual contact without her consent is supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the victim’s testimony. No basis exists to disturb respondent’s findings of credibility (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). The penalty does not shock our sense of fairness. We note petitioner’s plea of guilty to another specification charging him with illegal use of a cable box. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
Torres v. Kelly
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3519
N.Y. App. Div.2004Check TreatmentAI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
