History
  • No items yet
midpage
Haddad v. New York City Transit Authority
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2796
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004
|
Check Treatment

*256Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered August 16, 2002, which, inter alia, denied plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to amend their bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars subsequent to the filing of their note of issue and certificate of readiness to allege an additional injury to plaintiff George Haddad was properly denied. Plaintiffs offered no reasonable excuse for their delay in moving to amend, and, indeed, it appears from the record that there could be no reasonable excuse since plaintiffs had evidence of the newly asserted injury as early as a year prior to the proposed amendment (see Orros v Yick Ming Yip Realty, 258 AD2d 387, 388 [1999]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Haddad v. New York City Transit Authority
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Mar 18, 2004
Citation: 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2796
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.