Rahman v. City of New York
2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1226
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2004|
Check TreatmentPlaintiff failed to demonstrate that the municipality, through promises or actions, had assumed an affirmative duty to act on his behalf; that the municipality or its agents knew that inaction could lead to harm; that there was some form of direct contact between him and the municipality’s agents; and that he had relied on the municipality’s affirmative undertaking (Cuffy v City of New York, 69 NY2d 255, 260 [1987]). Concur—Nardelli, J.E, Saxe, Ellerin and Friedman, JJ.
