History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hoffer v. Silich
1 A.D.2d 317
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff Debra Hoffer appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Martin, J.), dated December 16, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted by her on the ground that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiff Debra Hoffer failed to come forward with sufficient admissible evidence to rebut the defendants’ initial showing that she did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Thus, summary judgment was properly granted to the defendants dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted by her (see Licari v Elliott, 57 NY2d 230 [1982]; Amato v Psaltakis, 279 AD2d 439 [2001]). Florio, J.E, Krausman, Luciano, Townes and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Hoffer v. Silich
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 3, 2003
Citation: 1 A.D.2d 317
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.