History
  • No items yet
midpage
Siu Chuen Chan v. Continental Broker-Dealer Corp.
2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12526
| N.Y. App. Div. | 2003
|
Check Treatment

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered November 12, 2002, which denied petitioner’s application to vacate an arbitration award dismissing his claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to rule 10314 (b) (2) (C) of the National Association of Securities Dealers Procedural Rules, it was within the arbitrator’s discretion to deny petitioner’s motion to preclude respondents’ answer for untimely service. Aside from the grounds specified in CPLR 7511 (b), courts may vacate an arbitration award only if it violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational, or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation upon the arbitral authority (Matter of Board of Educ. of Dover Union Free School Dist. v Dover-Wingdale Teachers’ Assn., 61 NY2d 913 [1984]). None of those situations is presented herein. We have considered and rejected the parties’ remaining contentions for affirmative relief. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Andrias, Rosenberger and Friedman, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Siu Chuen Chan v. Continental Broker-Dealer Corp.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 25, 2003
Citation: 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12526
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.