History
  • No items yet
midpage
Schenck v. Behgler
1 Silv. Ct. App. 385
| NY | 1887
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam

The default herein was regularly taken, and the counsel for defendants asks to have it opened and *387the case restored. We have looked into the return upon which the case would have to be argued in this court. It is very brief, and not an exception in it worthy of a moment’s consideration. The question as to the verdict being excessive cannot be reviewed here. Under these circumstances, the motion to open the default should be denied, with ten dollars costs.

All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Schenck v. Behgler
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 25, 1887
Citation: 1 Silv. Ct. App. 385
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.