History
  • No items yet
midpage
Van Deusen v. Rowley
1 Seld. Notes 130
| NY | 1853
|
Check Treatment

The defendants, at the instance of Mrs. Van Deusen, their sister, were cited to account, as administrators, be*131fore the surrogate of Columbia county. In taking the account, the surrogate charged the administrators with the value of twenty shares of the stock of the Farmers’ Bank of Hudson, as assets belonging to the estate. The Supreme Court affirmed the surrogate’s decree, and the administrators appealed.

A transfer of the stock had been executed on the books of the bank, by the intestate, eight or nine days before his death, to his son, Levi Eowley, and a certificate of the stock made out by the bank, and delivered to Levi.

The sole question presented in the case was one of fact, as to the competency of the intestate to make the transfer. The Court of Appeals came to a different conclusion on that question from that of the courts below, and reversed the decrees of those courts, so far as they charged the administrators with the value of this stock.

(S. C., 8 N. Y. 358.)

Case Details

Case Name: Van Deusen v. Rowley
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 13, 1853
Citation: 1 Seld. Notes 130
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.