History
  • No items yet
midpage
Michael Cooper v. Clarence Dupnik
933 F.2d 798
| 9th Cir. | 1991
|
Check Treatment

933 F.2d 798

Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent
of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in
her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam
Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County; Tom Taylor, an
employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department;
Weaver Barkman, an employee of Pima
County Sheriff's Department,
Defendants-Appellants.
Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent
of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in
her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam
Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County, Defendant,
and
City of Tucson; Tucson Police Department; Peter Ronstadt;
Karen Wright; Gene Scott; Timothy O'Sullivan;
Kay McCall, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 23, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge.

1

Michael P. Callahan, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Clarence Dupnik and Tom Taylor.

2

David L. Berkman, Murphy, Goering, Roberts & Holt, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Weaver Barkman.

3

David F. Toone, Kimble, Gothreau & Nelson, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Peter Ronstadt.

4

Stephen M. Weiss, Karp, Stoklin & Weiss, Winton D. Woods, Michael J. Bloom, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.

5

Prior report: 9th Cir., 924 F.2d 1520.

6

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

7

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Case Details

Case Name: Michael Cooper v. Clarence Dupnik
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: May 23, 1991
Citation: 933 F.2d 798
Docket Number: 88-15661
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.