1. The circumstances established by proof were sufficient to overcome the presumption of innocence on the part ofthe accused, and to sustain the hypothesis of his guilt, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.
2. There are no special assignments of error, and the trial judge did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
