History
  • No items yet
midpage
Spradley v. State
1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1915
|
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

1. Considered in connection with the charge as a whole, the excerpts complained of contain no error sufficient to require the grant of a new trial.

2. While the evidence is altogether circumstantial, it sufficiently supports the verdict of guilty, to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis.

3. The judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed..

Case Details

Case Name: Spradley v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 29, 1915
Citation: 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 386
Docket Number: 6720
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.