History
  • No items yet
midpage
City of Rome v. Ragan
86 S.E. 59
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1915
|
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

1. There was evidence supporting the verdict.

2. It does not appear from either of the two grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial that the cause of the movant was sufficiently prejudiced to have required the grant of a new trial; and the rulings of the court are not, for the reasons stated, erroneous.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: City of Rome v. Ragan
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 3, 1915
Citation: 86 S.E. 59
Docket Number: 5911
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.