History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hall v. Holman
15 Ga. App. 659
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1915
|
Check Treatment
Russell, 0. J.

1. Whether a judgment by default will be set aside or not is a question addressed to the sound discretion of the court by which it was rendered, and this court will not, as a general rule, interfere, unless such discretion has been grossly abused. Lambert v. Smith, 57 Ga. 25; Butler v. Strickland-Tillman Hardware Co., ante, 193.

2. That the defendant failed to file a plea at the appearance term “on account of a misunderstanding between client and counsel is unfortunate, but the fact presents no legal reason why the plaintiff, who acted but in the exercise of his right, should have the legal results of his suit set aside and again enter the field of litigation.” Moore v. Kelly, 109 Ga. 798-802 (35 S. E. 168).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, J., not presiding.

Case Details

Case Name: Hall v. Holman
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 3, 1915
Citation: 15 Ga. App. 659
Docket Number: 5610
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.