History
  • No items yet
midpage
First National Bank v. Brooks & Co.
82 S.E. 608
| Ga. Ct. App. | 1914
|
Check Treatment
Wade, J.

Tlie only issue in this ease, so far as appears from the record, was whether or not the indorsements and assignments entered on the three draf.ts sued upon were so entered bona fide and before maturity. While the evidence upon this point apparently preponderates in behalf of the plaintiff, still there is some evidence to authorize the finding which the jury returned in favor of the defendants, and since, in the state of the record, the errors complained of were immaterial, the discretion of the trial judge in refusing a new trial will not be interfered with.

Judgment affirmed.

Roan, J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: First National Bank v. Brooks & Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Aug 22, 1914
Citation: 82 S.E. 608
Docket Number: 5638
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.