History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moon v. Moon
271 Ga. 685
| Ga. | 1999
|
Check Treatment
Carley, Justice,

dissenting.

Because the record clearly shows that parental fitness was not a contested issue below, this case is ripe for decision. I therefore dissent to the majority’s remand for the purpose of addressing the previously unchallenged issue of parental fitness.

*686Decided November 15, 1999. Howard G. Sokol, Vicky O. Kimbrell, Phyllis J. Holmen, Lisa J. Krisher, for appellant. Martin L. Fierman, Alan W. Thrower, Kutner & Bloom, Jean M. Kutner, for appellees. David A. Webster, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Lynn M. Adam, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ShalenA. Sgrosso, Assistant Attorney General, amici curiae.

Case Details

Case Name: Moon v. Moon
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 15, 1999
Citation: 271 Ga. 685
Docket Number: S99A0758
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.