History
  • No items yet
midpage
Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark
149 Ga. 836
| Ga. | 1920
|
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in refusing to grant an interlocutory injunction.

2. An issue riot made by the pleadings of either party is not before the court, though evidence upon the issue was submitted upon the hearing for interlocutory injunction, and counsel for both parties, in their briefs of file in this court, treat the issue as in the case. See Hicks v. Marshall, 67 Ga. 713; Martin v. Nichols, 127 Ga. 705 (56 S. E. 995). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Petition for injunction. Before Judge Harrell. Calhoun superior court. March 4, 1919. Milner & Farkas, for plaintiff. Yeomans & Wilkinson and Robert R. Forrester, for defendants.

Case Details

Case Name: Keystone Pecan Co. v. Clark
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 14, 1920
Citation: 149 Ga. 836
Docket Number: No. 1394
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.