History
  • No items yet
midpage
Boyd v. Edenfield
147 Ga. 23
| Ga. | 1917
|
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

This case is controlled by the rule that “The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and the facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge. ” Civil Code, § 6204.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Complaint for land. Before Judge Hardeman. Emanuel superior court. March 11, 1916. Williams & Bradley and B. T. Rawlings, for'plaintiff. Baffold & Jordan, for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Boyd v. Edenfield
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: May 16, 1917
Citation: 147 Ga. 23
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.