History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hartridge, Chisholm & Loyd v. Fry
41 Ga. 104
| Ga. | 1870
|
Check Treatment
McCAY, J.

Were it not for the plea of the defendant, and the admission of record there made, we would not disturb this verdict. But we do not think the jury had a right to disregard the admission in the plea. The plaintiffs were not called upon, as the case stood, to make out a case, except for what they *106claimed over and above the admission. To permit the jury to reject this is to entrap the plaintiffs; so long as this plea stood as part of the record, there was no dispute as to the sum admitted. We suppose his Honor, the Judge, did not, in his charge, think of the plea. But the jury were none the less misled.

Judgment reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hartridge, Chisholm & Loyd v. Fry
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Jun 15, 1870
Citation: 41 Ga. 104
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.