History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mahon v. Sewell
1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190
| New York Court of Common Pleas | 1889
|
Check Treatment
Daly, J.

The appellant does not bring himself within the rule for granting rearguments as laid down by the court. Curley v. Tomlinson, 5 Daly, 283. He does not show that any question decisive of the case has been overlooked by the court, nor that the decision is in conflict with an express statute, or with a controlling decision of the court. This is an application to re-argue the case upon the points and authorities upon which it has been already heard and disposed of. The application should be denied, with $10 costs. All concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mahon v. Sewell
Court Name: New York Court of Common Pleas
Date Published: Dec 2, 1889
Citation: 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1190
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.